Monday, August 15, 2011

The book that solves all the problems - HA!!

So, I was browsing through Hastings the other day waiting for my boys to get done watching Green Lantern - (I did not feel up to another super hero movie) anywho I found a book that apparently will solve all of our problems in 49 steps if we just read the book and watch their DVD along with it. The name of the book is Teach Like a Champion by Doug Lemov and we can become a Jossey-Bass Teacher - I think they were the publishers/ program - It says 49 Techniques that put students on the path to college. It is for K-12 teachers. I flipped through the book to see what it was about and I got a little riled up and one of my first reactions was "of geez, I hope my school capacitor and principal doesn't see this because I can see us using this in our school improvement process and watching the videos to see good teaching." The chapter I read was called "100 percent" and their premise was that every student should be actively engaged in the lesson 100 percent of the time and be 100 percent proficient in every lesson and you as a teacher are doing something wrong if they are not. There was a chapter about not allowing the children a chance to contemplate and sit - they need to be "100 percent" all engaged and all in - no one can opt out and if the students take time to think and not immediately do the lesson then you as the teacher have failed. I flipped around more and realized that this is a "how to manual" and if you just follow these 49 steps you to can be an excellent teacher.
Which gets me thinking about a point that I have always come back to - is a teacher "born or made"? I think that teachers have a natural inclination for teaching - thus being born - but we learn skills that we hone that make us better. We also have a natural inclination towards different age groups and subjects. I could never teach older grades like high school 1. they are taller than me and 2. all those hormones and attitudes are so intimidating and annoying ;) and I know that many of you could never teach the younger grades. We have natural gifts for different age groups and I am glad we do!
I think this book annoys me because it made it seem that anyone can teach if they follow these 49 steps and these 49 steps do not allow for individual styles or the children's differences.
These were my thoughts and I wanted to share. What do you think?
PS: Good luck on your school year! I hope it's wonderful and full of joy and song!

Tuesday, August 2, 2011

The Future of Education...100 Years Ago

Daniel Pink, the author of the book Drive,(which I recommend), wrote a blog about a blog he read...got that?...about an article from "Ladies Home Journal" written 100 years ago. It had some interesting stuff, but Pink focused on what they thought education would look like today. It goes with some of what was discussed in class this summer. Here it is! What are your thoughts?

Sunday, July 31, 2011

An old editorial for your consideration...

So, I thought that in the spirit of contributing I would share this piece that was published a couple years ago in the local paper.  Although I'd prefer to link, the Daily News is a subscription only site so the link doesn't work.  I think that this is still a pretty accurate reflection of my opinions about education, even though the Core program has now been eliminated. Enjoy:

For the past three years it has been my privilege to teach in the University of Idaho Core Discovery program.  Each year I look forward to meeting the new crop of first-year students.   I love to see their passion for the adventures of college life; but, from a pedagogical perspective, I have also learned to dread the first few weeks of class.  At the beginning of every semester, like clockwork, I inevitably get the same question from my students: “Is this going to be on the test?” 

I take great pains to inform my students that I don’t believe in tests, but prefer to assess their learning through reflective journaling, critical essays, and research papers, but that response makes them very nervous and creates tremendous tension in the classroom.  The anxiety level reaches fever pitch when I give them their first assignment, usually a variation on the “This I Believe” essay format made popular by Edward R. Murrow in the 1950’s and revived by NPR several years ago.  There are always a handful of students that rise to the challenge, but the vast majority struggle to complete the assignment.  Most students provide me with a generic essay that tells me more about what they have been told they should believe than what they really think.

Every year it is more and more difficult to see my students struggle with expressing and understanding themselves.  The rigidly prescriptive requirements of NCLB and the alienating nature of standards-based curriculum is the primary reason why so many students come to the university unprepared for the academic demands of college courses.  Regardless of how they perform on high school exit exams, like the WASL or ISAT, students are still coming to the university horribly underprepared.

The 2009 ACT College Readiness Report indicates that only 21 percent of students meet the knowledge and skill benchmarks in reading, writing, math, and science required to succeed in entry-level college courses.   In an interview on February 6, 2010 Secretary of Education Arne Duncan cited the statistic that 60% of college students have to take remedial courses in Math or English before they can adequately compete at the college level.   

Current educational methods in U.S. public schools alienate students by focusing on discrete, measurable, learning outcomes that are decontextualized and focused on getting students to pass standardized tests like the WASL and ISAT in the interest of keeping schools scores high enough to avoid official sanctions while continuing to move students through with the lowest cost possible.  This focus on a single homogenized curriculum necessitates the marginalization of diverse voices and perspectives, creating students with narrow worldviews and little connection to place or community.  Learning, for many students, has become a rote, mechanical exercise while the creativity and critical thinking skills, so essential to success at the college level, have been removed from the entire K-12 educational enterprise.

The Core Curriculum at the University of Idaho is committed to challenging and supporting this first generation of NCLB students through creative, interdisciplinary curricula that requires them to think about their place in their communities and their identity in the context of a broader, more diverse world of ideas; but the Core Curriculum at the University of Idaho is a program that is hanging by a thread.  Since its inception over 10 years ago the Core has had to beg and borrow from other colleges to maintain its status and solvency.  The Core Curriculum has become an easy target for administrators and faculty who see it as a drain on limited resources that could be used to hedge against deeper departmental cuts in these years of tight budgets.  But the Core Curriculum has a proven track record of promoting student retention and future success at the University of Idaho.   It has never been more important that first-year students at the University of Idaho experience an outreach-based pedagogy that challenges the technocratic methods they have grown accustomed to in the public schools.  In my opinion its one of the few programs that might help them recover their humanity and reinstill the wonder and passion of learning.

LY + swimming = a difficult combination

Our day on Dworshak was just what I needed--sunshine, warm water, fun people, water skiing, the relaxation station, great cohort friends and, of course, laughter. Breanna, Ryan, Angie and I did learn that one should not try laughter yoga while treading water. Many thanks to Angie for the great day!

Could have been worse than a locked gate!

Just want you all to know the day could have been worse than just a locked gate :) When I went to leave the store parking lot after we got back, my car wouldn't start. Battery was dead, completely, no life left what so ever, tried to jump it, nothing. New battery now and all is good. Don't even want imagine what would have had to happen if it had died on the mountain.